Snyk scans your code and dependencies. NightVision attacks your running application and discovers the APIs nobody documented. Different layers — and one big gap if you only have Snyk.
These are two different tools built for two different worlds. The question isn't which one is better — it's which one fits where you actually are.
Snyk earned its place in the developer security stack. Its SCA is best-in-class for open-source dependency vulnerabilities, Snyk Code brings fast SAST into the IDE and PR, and container/IaC scanning rounds out a genuinely developer-friendly platform. For knowing what's in your code and dependencies, Snyk is a strong choice.
Snyk does not do real DAST or API discovery. Nothing in the platform tests your running application, validates exploitability, or finds the undocumented endpoints attackers probe first. Teams that standardize on Snyk alone have deep visibility into code and dependencies — and zero dynamic validation of what's actually exploitable in production-shaped conditions. That's the layer NightVision covers.
A direct comparison across the dimensions that matter most for modern application security programs.
| Capability | NightVision | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic testing (DAST) of running apps | ✅ Core capability — 3–10 minute scans | ❌ Not offered |
| Undocumented API discovery | ✅ API eNVy™ generates specs from source in <20 seconds, then tests live | ❌ Not offered |
| Runtime exploitability validation | ✅ Every finding dynamically validated | ❌ Static findings only — no runtime proof |
| Open-source dependency scanning (SCA) | ⚠️ Not offered — pair with an SCA tool | ✅ Best-in-class |
| Static code analysis (SAST) | ⚠️ Static context used for traceback, not standalone SAST | ✅ Snyk Code — fast, IDE-integrated |
| Container / IaC scanning | ❌ Not offered | ✅ Included in platform |
| Findings pinpointed to code line | ✅ Yes — with runtime proof of exploitability | ✅ Yes — for static findings |
| CI/CD-native integration | ✅ Native — GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps | ✅ Native — strong developer integrations |
| Developer self-serve | ✅ Onboarding in 6–12 clicks | ✅ Strong developer experience |
| Private network scanning | ✅ Smart proxy — zero infrastructure changes | ❌ N/A — doesn't scan running apps |
| Free tier | ✅ Free 3-day trial, no card required | ✅ Free tier for small teams |
| Pricing | ✅ From $100/month — transparent | ⚠️ Per-developer; grows with headcount |
These aren't feature checkboxes. They're the reasons security teams running CI/CD at scale are making the switch.
Snyk tells you what's in your code. NightVision proves what's exploitable in your running app — SQL injection, auth bypass, the OWASP Top 10 in live conditions.
API eNVy™ discovers undocumented and shadow endpoints from source and tests them dynamically. No Snyk product covers this.
Validated findings tell you which issues are real right now — the prioritization signal static scanners can't provide.
PR-native, minutes-fast, self-serve — the workflow Snyk users already expect, applied to dynamic testing.
Snyk for dependencies and code, NightVision for runtime and APIs. The overlap is zero; the coverage gap each fills is real.
The smart proxy scans internal apps with zero infrastructure changes — relevant only to a tool that actually tests running apps.
"We won an award at our company's internal hackathon for demonstrating developer teams executing a DAST scan on a web app in eight minutes from start to finish during build time, with tickets opened automatically with Engineering."Steve McKinnon · Senior Application Security Engineer, BeyondTrust
No — this is the core difference. Snyk's platform covers SCA (open-source dependencies), SAST (code analysis), container, and IaC scanning. It does not perform dynamic application security testing against a running app, and it has no API discovery. NightVision is a purpose-built DAST and API security platform.
NightVision. Snyk's findings are static — patterns in code, dependencies, and configs. NightVision attacks the running application and validates that findings are actually exploitable, then ties them to the exact file and line.
Mostly complement. Many teams run Snyk for dependency and code scanning and NightVision for dynamic testing and API discovery. Where they overlap is budget and the question of which findings deserve developer attention — validated runtime findings cut through static noise.
Yes — API eNVy™ generates a complete OpenAPI spec from your source code in under 20 seconds, then dynamically tests every endpoint. Snyk has no equivalent capability.
Yes. Like Snyk, NightVision is built for developer self-serve: onboarding in 6–12 clicks, scans on every PR, findings in the pull request. The difference is what's being tested — running apps and APIs rather than code and dependencies.
NightVision starts at $100/month with a free 3-day trial. Snyk has a free tier for small teams; paid plans are per-developer and grow with headcount. The two price on different axes since they test different things.
Run a free scan on one of your apps. No credit card. No sales call. Results in under 10 minutes.