Checkmarx tells you what your code looks like. NightVision proves what's actually exploitable — live, in minutes, tied back to the exact line of code.
These are two different tools built for two different worlds. The question isn't which one is better — it's which one fits where you actually are.
Checkmarx is a leader in static application security testing. Its SAST engine has broad language coverage, deep code-flow analysis, and the Checkmarx One platform bundles SCA, IaC scanning, and more. For organizations that want comprehensive code-level analysis early in the SDLC, Checkmarx's static depth is genuine.
Static analysis predicts; it doesn't prove. SAST output is notorious for false-positive volume that buries teams in triage, and Checkmarx's DAST is a newer, secondary capability following the traditional slow-scan model. Without runtime validation, teams burn engineering hours on findings that were never exploitable — while undocumented APIs, invisible to code-pattern matching against specs, go untested dynamically.
A direct comparison across the dimensions that matter most for modern application security programs.
| Capability | NightVision | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| Core approach | ✅ Dynamic — tests the live app, validates exploitability | ⚠️ Static — analyzes code patterns; prediction, not proof |
| Validated / evidence-based findings | ✅ Every finding dynamically validated | ❌ SAST findings require manual triage; high FP volume |
| Average scan time | ✅ 3–10 minutes per app or API | ⚠️ SAST varies; DAST follows traditional long-scan model |
| Findings pinpointed to code line | ✅ Yes — with proof of runtime exploitability | ⚠️ Yes — but without runtime validation |
| Undocumented API discovery | ✅ API eNVy™ generates specs from source in <20 seconds, then tests them live | ⚠️ Code-level API visibility; no dynamic testing of shadow endpoints |
| CI/CD-native integration | ✅ Native — scans on every PR in minutes | ⚠️ Integrations exist; full-platform workflow is heavier |
| Onboarding time | ✅ Under 1 minute — 6 to 12 clicks | ❌ Days to weeks; platform deployment and tuning |
| Developer self-serve | ✅ Developers run scans independently | ⚠️ Security-team configured; triage-heavy for developers |
| Private network scanning | ✅ Smart proxy — zero infrastructure changes | ⚠️ N/A for SAST; DAST requires setup |
| AI-assisted remediation | ✅ Contextual AI explanations per finding | ⚠️ AI features emerging on platform |
| Free trial | ✅ Free 3-day trial, no card required | ❌ Demo/quote process |
| Pricing | ✅ From $100/month — transparent | ❌ Enterprise quotes, typically 5–6 figures/year |
These aren't feature checkboxes. They're the reasons security teams running CI/CD at scale are making the switch.
Static analysis flags patterns. NightVision attacks the running app and confirms what's actually exploitable — before a developer spends a minute on it.
Evidence-based findings mean no mountain of SAST false positives to grind through.
API eNVy™ discovers undocumented endpoints from source and tests them live — coverage code-pattern analysis can't validate.
3–10 minute scans fit inside the pull request workflow, not a nightly batch job.
NightVision combines static context with dynamic validation — file-and-line precision plus runtime proof.
From $100/month versus enterprise platform contracts.
"We won an award at our company's internal hackathon for demonstrating developer teams executing a DAST scan on a web app in eight minutes from start to finish during build time, with tickets opened automatically with Engineering."Steve McKinnon · Senior Application Security Engineer, BeyondTrust
NightVision. Checkmarx's core strength is static analysis (SAST) — finding patterns in code. NightVision runs dynamic scans against the live application and validates that findings are actually exploitable, then ties them back to the exact line of code.
They solve different problems. Checkmarx is strong in code analysis; NightVision validates real-world exploitability dynamically. Many teams pair a SAST tool with NightVision — and use NightVision's validated findings to cut through SAST noise.
SAST tools like Checkmarx are known for high false-positive volumes that require triage. NightVision is evidence-based: findings are dynamically validated for exploitability before they reach a developer.
Yes — API eNVy™ generates a complete OpenAPI spec from your source code in under 20 seconds, then dynamically tests every endpoint, documented or not.
NightVision scans complete in 3–10 minutes. Checkmarx's DAST (a newer addition to its platform) follows the traditional longer-scan model and is secondary to its SAST core.
NightVision starts at $100/month with a free 3-day trial. Checkmarx One is enterprise-priced via quote, typically five to six figures annually.
Run a free scan on one of your apps. No credit card. No sales call. Results in under 10 minutes.